|
|
|
|
|
|
相关口腔诊所
|
|
|
|
两种常用唇裂修复术对上颌骨生长
|
|
发表时间:2007-1-13 8:26:00
|
|
更多保健方面的文章请到中国保健网>>
作者单位:石冰(华西医科大学口腔医学院 610041);龙洁(华西医科大学口腔医学院 610041);王晴(华西医科大学口腔医学院 610041);乔鞠(华西医科大学口腔医学院 610041) 关键词: millard; tennison; 上颌骨生长 摘 要:目的 为了客观全面地评价当今常用两种唇裂修复方法对上颌骨生长发育影响的异同。方法 实验采用40只(30天龄)纯种日本长耳白兔,随机分成正常对照组(10只),造裂组(10只),millard法修补唇裂组(10只),tennison法修补唇裂组(10只),术后26周(30周龄)处死全部动物,行头颅测量。结果 两种手术方法均可造成上颌骨较正常对照组和造裂组明显的上颌骨生长抑制,tennison法又较millard法会引起更明显的上颌骨生长发育受限,两种方法对上颌骨生长发育影响差异的主要原因是术后上唇组织移动规律的不同所致。结论 millard法与tennison法修复唇裂对上颌骨生长发育的影响程度不同。the different influence between millard-lip-repair and tennison-lip-repair on maxillary growth:a contrast study in rabbitsshi bing, long jie, wang qing et al college of stomatology, west china university of medical sciences (610041) abstract: objective to evaluate the difference and similarity of the maxillary growth after lip-repair between with the millard rotation-advancement and with the tennison triangular.methods fourth japan white rabbits were divied into 4 groups in random. group ⅰ was unoperated controls, group ⅱ was unrepaired controls, group ⅲ was repaired by millard lip-repair, group ⅳ was repaired by tennison lip-repair. all the animals were sacrified and measured at 26 weeks postoperatively (30 weeks old).results we found that both the two cheiloplasty had inhibited the maxillary growth, furthermore, the group ⅳ (tennison lip-repair) had the more inhibitory effect than group ⅲ (millard lip-repair), it is because the different sof共有4条文章 页次:1/4分页:9 1 2 3 4 8 :
|
|
|
|
|
|
医患交流
|
|
无论你有什么口腔方面的问题,都可以在这里提问,我们的口腔专家将会在24小时内在医患交流栏目为你解答
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
相关查找
|
|
统计数据触目惊心两种
两种常用唇裂修复术对
两种充填材料治疗龋病
两种糊剂用于根尖诱导
两种基托材料制作的活
两种常用唇裂修复术对
两种常用唇裂修复术对
两种种植材料对龈下优
青岛医疗抽检公布结果
先后对两种口腔用药物
|
|
|
|
|
|